Originally Posted by phikapman87

Cal has been overrated just about every year in the preseason poll and i'm sure they will be this year. they come into pac-10 play wit a boosted ranking and get destroyed by conference teams

Get off my nuts, they were undefeated in out of conference which is really the only thing that mattered last year.

Ever think that maybe the Pac-10 was a difficult conference?

(i predict that war eagle quotes me saying the pac-10 sucked in bowl games and then says SEC > ALL)

Originally Posted by TheOnlyDzasta?

Get off my nuts, they were undefeated in out of conference which is really the only thing that mattered last year.

Ever think that maybe the Pac-10 was a difficult conference?

(i predict that war eagle quotes me saying the pac-10 sucked in bowl games and then says SEC > ALL)

SEC>ALL
How dumb do you have to be to think the PAC 10 is a difficult confrence. They have one good team every year and one surprise team that is decent. Cal goes 8-4 next year.

Originally Posted by phikapman87

WVU----far overrated, theyre not gonna be able to work that system that good without rdriguez

i really hope you're not serious.

Originally Posted by howd.i.do.that

i really hope you're not serious.

They will still be good but not near as good.

Originally Posted by War Eagle

Cal goes 8-4 next year.

Believe it or now, i actually agree with you. :/

The biggest news of the week is Perrilloux of LSU being suspended indefinitely for violating the team rules. I should have made this thread, f..k.

Originally Posted by Bizzad

The biggest news of the week is Perrilloux of LSU being suspended indefinitely for violating the team rules. I should have made this thread, f.ck.

He's such a dumbass. They get once of a lifetime opportunity and they f..k it up, it makes me sick. Why can't all college football players be like Johnathan Stewart.

Originally Posted by TheOnlyDzasta?

Get off my nuts, they were undefeated in out of conference which is really the only thing that mattered last year.

Ever think that maybe the Pac-10 was a difficult conference?

(i predict that war eagle quotes me saying the pac-10 sucked in bowl games and then says SEC > ALL)

wow, i have to ask, does it hurt being that dumb.

first off, since when does conference play not matter?

second off, the pac-10 is bad, theyre the worst major conference besides the BIG EAST, yea u can say all u want bout oregon and ASU getting up in the polls, but what happened at the end of the year. that conference is overrated and USC dominates it

Originally Posted by phikapman87

wow, i have to ask, does it hurt being that dumb.

first off, since when does conference play not matter?

second off, the pac-10 is bad, theyre the worst major conference besides the BIG EAST, yea u can say all u want bout oregon and ASU getting up in the polls, but what happened at the end of the year. that conference is overrated and USC dominates it

First off, get off my balls. I'm not defending the pac-10 but im saying that people give it a lot of crap. theres so much east coast bias in this country and arrogant assholes like yourself that just don't see the bigger picture. f..k stats, f..k records, nothing matters until the games are played. That's why i think sports analyzing is the dumbest thing. Say what you want about teams and conferences and then watch the games and shut ur f..king mouth. O im sure USC dominates the conference. But lets see this.

Healthy Oregon -- rapes them
Hurt, sh.tyy, crappy cal -- win by a touchdown and they were gonna loose till cal threw a pic
Stanford -- do i need to say more?
And all but a few of the other Pac-10 teams gave USC a run for their money this season.

im not saying conference paly matters, but so many people only compare teams based on how well they do in conference. This about it, coaches, and teams, play each other EVERY year in conference; they learn how to beat them. Then comes our of conference, when you paly teams u never play. NO ONE looks at out of conference. That shows true skill is how well you do against teams u dont play every year and other conferences. W.e go on, use ASU and Oregon and Cal falling appart as excuses, but Oregon rolled their bowl game (without dixon), Cal likewise, and ASU choked against a good TX team. And USC? made the big-10 look bad. So, that pac-10 conference is pretty damn bad. mmmmhmmm your right.

f..k off


now let me ask u a question:

does it hurt to be that ignorant?

Originally Posted by TheOnlyDzasta?

First off, get off my balls. I'm not defending the pac-10 but im saying that people give it a lot of crap. theres so much east coast bias in this country and arrogant a.sholes like yourself that just don't see the bigger picture. f.ck stats, f.ck records, nothing matters until the games are played. That's why i think sports analyzing is the dumbest thing. Say what you want about teams and conferences and then watch the games and shut ur f.cking mouth. O im sure USC dominates the conference. But lets see this.

Healthy Oregon -- rapes them
Hurt, sh.tyy, crappy cal -- win by a touchdown and they were gonna loose till cal threw a pic
Stanford -- do i need to say more?
And all but a few of the other Pac-10 teams gave USC a run for their money this season.

im not saying conference paly matters, but so many people only compare teams based on how well they do in conference. This about it, coaches, and teams, play each other EVERY year in conference; they learn how to beat them. Then comes our of conference, when you paly teams u never play. NO ONE looks at out of conference. That shows true skill is how well you do against teams u dont play every year and other conferences. W.e go on, use ASU and Oregon and Cal falling appart as excuses, but Oregon rolled their bowl game (without dixon), Cal likewise, and ASU choked against a good TX team. And USC? made the big-10 look bad. So, that pac-10 conference is pretty damn bad. mmmmhmmm your right.

f.ck off


now let me ask u a question:

does it hurt to be that ignorant?

trust me dude, no one here is "on ur balls" as much as u may like havin guys on them.

second off, ucant say USC soesnt dominate that conference cuz they have won it for the past several years. yes, stanford gave them a run but it was luck. cal is inconsistent and in no way will compete for the pac-10 title next year.

and how is there east coast bias? do u have idea wut ur talkin about. there's has been no discussion in this thread about any east coasts, mostly SEC, BIG-10 teams, but i doubt u know where that is located.

cal is garbage, there not any serious contender and prolly couldnt even win the WAC, which is the Western Athletic Conf., but im sure u knew that (sarcasm)

the worst part is, i hate USC, unfortunately for u, i hate ignorant ppl like u worse