Originally Posted by H3F Carnage

Yeah what happened with him? I saw it on ESPN the other day and was shocked caused he wouldn't do anything like that.

SI's top 32 nfl teams for next season

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...ngs/index.html

Originally Posted by H3F Carnage

SI's top 32 nfl teams for next season

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...ngs/index.html

IF YOU WANNA CROWN NEW ENGLAND, THEN CROWN THEIR ASS ALREADY!

Originally Posted by H3F Carnage

SI's top 32 nfl teams for next season

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...ngs/index.html

Facepalm, another Pats ass kisser.

"the Giants will be fortunate if Michael Strahan plays."
Well if he does retire it would be a loss. But that means that Justin Tuck would either play every down or they will move Kiwinuka back to DE, and they drafted another DE. But I do think Strahan will be back for another, and he can still play very well.

LMFAO. They have Minnesota of all teams before the Packers. What a complete joke. Since when does losing your QB drag the entire team down with it? Especially when you have a QB that's been in the system for three years. Oh, and the Vikings have a proven QB? I don't think so. lulz.

Originally Posted by LionHearT

LMFAO. They have Minnesota of all teams before the Packers. What a complete joke. Since when does losing your QB drag the entire team down with it? Especially when you have a QB that's been in the system for three years. Oh, and the Vikings have a proven QB? I don't think so. lulz.

The Vikings definitely are a surer bet, they have the best rushing attack, and their defense is going to be even better.

The Packers, however, have unproven players. Don't know what Aaron Rodgers will do, or if he is even good. The Packers taking 2, not 1, 2 QBs in the draft seems to make me think their is a competition for that spot. And Ryan Grant can turn out to be a fluke.

So the Vikings I would bank on over the Packers.

Originally Posted by H3F Carnage

The Vikings definitely are a surer bet, they have the best rushing attack, and their defense is going to be even better.

The Packers, however, have unproven players. Don't know what Aaron Rodgers will do, or if he is even good. The Packers taking 2, not 1, 2 QBs in the draft seems to make me think their is a competition for that spot. And Ryan Grant can turn out to be a fluke.

So the Vikings I would bank on over the Packers.

Bank on them all you want, but they didn't do squat last year, and adding one WR on offense isn't going to make their passing game that much better. Our defense is better, and we definitely have the edge with WRs. Rodgers is about as proven as Jackson is now. I mean, sure Jackson has one year under his belt, but he played terrible last year. Rodgers can't do much worse than he did.

The Packers have a very young and talented team behind Rodgers. The Vikings have improved, just not enough to be better than the Packers. Yet. We'll find out early with the MNF to open the season.

Originally Posted by H3F Carnage

The Vikings definitely are a surer bet, they have the best rushing attack, and their defense is going to be even better.

The Packers, however, have unproven players. Don't know what Aaron Rodgers will do, or if he is even good. The Packers taking 2, not 1, 2 QBs in the draft seems to make me think their is a competition for that spot. And Ryan Grant can turn out to be a fluke.

So the Vikings I would bank on over the Packers.

A fluke? He rushed for nearly 1000 yards in only 9 games of work last year. That's pretty good if you ask me. He was like 2-3 in the league in rushing during that time.

Originally Posted by LionHearT

A fluke? He rushed for nearly 1000 yards in only 9 games of work last year. That's pretty good if you ask me. He was like 2-3 in the league in rushing during that time.

I still wish the Giants never got rid of him, but o well.

Originally Posted by LionHearT

A fluke? He rushed for nearly 1000 yards in only 9 games of work last year. That's pretty good if you ask me. He was like 2-3 in the league in rushing during that time.

Having 1 good 1/2 a season doesn't make you good. In the NFL I've seen bigger flops.

Originally Posted by LionHearT

Bank on them all you want, but they didn't do squat last year, and adding one WR on offense isn't going to make their passing game that much better. Our defense is better, and we definitely have the edge with WRs. Rodgers is about as proven as Jackson is now. I mean, sure Jackson has one year under his belt, but he played terrible last year. Rodgers can't do much worse than he did.

The Packers have a very young and talented team behind Rodgers. The Vikings have improved, just not enough to be better than the Packers. Yet. We'll find out early with the MNF to open the season.

Well in comparison the Packers didn't do squat without Brett Farve, so who's to assume they will.

The Packers PASSING defense is better, the Vikings had the best rush defense in the league. Now with Jared Allen their Pass defense is going to be better.

Rodgers isn't as proven has Jackson is, don't be a homer. Rodgers hasn't even started a game.