Halo 3 Forum
Welcome, Unregistered!
 | Don't have an account? Register Now!
Search:  Advanced Search
Halo 3 Forum: The Biggest Halo 3 Forum
Heres my question to Catholics and Cristians (and whoever else hates gays)
NiceGuy
Baby's Daddy, Scrooge
  #121 (permalink) Default 07-11-2008
 
NiceGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: is irrelevant
Posts: 20,365

Send a message via AIM to NiceGuy

Ethics, ethics, ethics.

So, Delay, what do you think of artificial insemination and surrogate mothers? Is it impermissible for a couple who love each other and want a child but can't "naturally" (we could go into that word, because it's really silly, to me, that it exists anyway - especially in argument and ESPECIALLY in ethics) to undergo these kinds of procedures? Are infertile women supposed to just deal with it? Lest they go to hell?
__________________

 
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links


Heres my question to Catholics and Cristians (and whoever else hates gays)
iwrestledaduck
Level 11
  #122 (permalink) Default 07-11-2008
 
iwrestledaduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida!
Posts: 79


Quote:
Originally Posted by NiceGuy View Post
Ethics, ethics, ethics.

So, Delay, what do you think of artificial insemination and surrogate mothers? Is it impermissible for a couple who love each other and want a child but can't "naturally" (we could go into that word, because it's really silly, to me, that it exists anyway - especially in argument and ESPECIALLY in ethics) to undergo these kinds of procedures? Are infertile women supposed to just deal with it? Lest they go to hell?
Bringing out the "God impregnating a woman without her consent argument, huh? I remember something along the lines of "Premarital sex" being a sin and/or something that is greatly frowned upon when it comes to Christianity. I would think Mary would have to be married to "God" before having sex. Don't say that they did not have sex, people - even fifth grade health class explains reproduction.

My thoughts on "Homosexuality and religion" is: There's a thing called "Free will" and Homosexuals seem to demonstrate it better than Christians.
__________________
Conceived in a hell beyond your depth of perception.
Chaotic case of conquering domination.
Psychopath snaps fired chains of imprisonment.
A bludgeoning force that's undermining the government!

Inflict strain upon the structure!
Collapsing below my pressure!
Inflict strain upon the structure!
Collapsing below my pressure!

Break of the edgecrusher...

Last edited by iwrestledaduck; 07-11-2008 at 02:43 AM.
 
Reply With Quote
Heres my question to Catholics and Cristians (and whoever else hates gays)
NiceGuy
Baby's Daddy, Scrooge
  #123 (permalink) Default 07-11-2008
 
NiceGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: is irrelevant
Posts: 20,365

Send a message via AIM to NiceGuy

Quote:
Originally Posted by iwrestledaduck View Post
Bringing out the "God impregnating a woman without her consent argument, huh? I remember something along the lines of "Premarital sex" being a sin and/or something that is greatly frowned upon when it comes to Christianity. I would think Mary would have to be married to "God" before having sex. Don't say that they did not have sex, people - even fifth grade health class explains reproduction.

My thoughts on "Homosexuality and religion" is: There's a thing called "Free will" and Homosexuals seem to demonstrate it better than Christians.
Homosexuality has nothing do to with free will.
__________________

 
Reply With Quote
Heres my question to Catholics and Cristians (and whoever else hates gays)
iwrestledaduck
Level 11
  #124 (permalink) Default 07-11-2008
 
iwrestledaduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida!
Posts: 79


Quote:
Originally Posted by NiceGuy View Post
Homosexuality has nothing do to with free will.
People have the freedom of feeling and choosing what they want. How would the thing of "Free will" not occur with something dealing with feelings? Men are not confined to just women as women are not just confined to men. Maybe I'm more or less referring to "Freedom of choice."
__________________
Conceived in a hell beyond your depth of perception.
Chaotic case of conquering domination.
Psychopath snaps fired chains of imprisonment.
A bludgeoning force that's undermining the government!

Inflict strain upon the structure!
Collapsing below my pressure!
Inflict strain upon the structure!
Collapsing below my pressure!

Break of the edgecrusher...
 
Reply With Quote
Heres my question to Catholics and Cristians (and whoever else hates gays)
NiceGuy
Baby's Daddy, Scrooge
  #125 (permalink) Default 07-11-2008
 
NiceGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: is irrelevant
Posts: 20,365

Send a message via AIM to NiceGuy

Maybe you're referring to freedom of expression rather than freedom of sexual preference. Expression is different than a biological sexual attraction.
__________________

 
Reply With Quote
Heres my question to Catholics and Cristians (and whoever else hates gays)
sC DeLAy
Level 29
  #126 (permalink) Default 07-12-2008
 
sC DeLAy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Huntington Beach
Posts: 1,602

Send a message via AIM to sC DeLAy Send a message via Skype™ to sC DeLAy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spooky View Post
I accept the intelligence in your sentiment, I understand that the differences in our argument are based on the fact that I am not a religious person. My views are based on my favor of science, philosophy, and social empathy. So your scripture quotes fall on deaf ears, but nevertheless allow your fellow agonist to appreciate your knowledge on the subject you are defending.

My stance on "god's" intention involving homosexuals is that creation has no emotional investments in our choice of sex partners nor any other living thing.
Wow, I'm honestly profoundly amazed that you were so polite to me . You're the first person who seems rationally intelligent and actually accepts the fellow debaters point of view on a debatable issue. Thank you, for that, I commend you and appreciate your response which you also seem very much educated on. Back on track now...

This is what your original statement was. "I do not think that there is a being that makes an effort to have an opinion on my sexual partner."
My response to you by using bible verses was to say that yes, there is a superioir being, and also that, yes he does in fact have an opinion on your sexual partner.

Sex is more than physical (although many people, especially men, would not agree) it is also emotional and spiritual. The unifying of two bodies into one, and the giving of ones self to another. I would say that's pretty spiritual and emotional. Matthew 19:4-6 is Jesus talking to a group of Pharisees, He said...
"Haven't you read," he replied, "that at the beginning the Creator 'made them male and female,' and said, 'For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh'? So they are no longer two, but one."
It's just that the media and todays society has succesfully annihilated the purpose of sex. So many many people have a very twisted scewed view of what sex was even intended for.

The entire rest of your post under the part of which I highlighted I would break down into 4 sections....
1. "Not every living thing needs a female mate to reproduce (take account of the self breeding plants and animals)"
I would agree with this. God created them that way, so let them multiply accordingly.

2. "You are only addressing a problem that affects people who want to have children naturally (also ignoring the unnatural process of artificial insemination)."
I am addressing all people. I think it is wrong for the same sex to be with one another romantically/sexually. That's not how it's supposed to be. Male and female were created for one another, not female for female, and not male for male. Genesis 2:18-24 says this...
Then the LORD God said, "It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him." Now out of the ground the LORD God had formed every beast of the field and every bird of the heavens and brought them to the man to see what he would call them. And whatever the man called every living creature, that was its name. The man gave names to all livestock and to the birds of the heavens and to every beast of the field. But for Adam there was not found a helper fit for him. So the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and while he slept took one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh. And the rib that the LORD God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man. Then the man said, "This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man." Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.

3. "The fact that I might enjoy the company of a female companion occasionally in my own private life, I hope, would not be an issue with my ethics."
I would say that the passage above is pretty clear that what you wrote above is wrong. Doesn't matter if it's your own private life or not. Doesn't matter if it's occasionally or not. It's wrong.

4. "The concept of homosexuality is a socially created phobia. There is no such thing as "we are not supposed to", that only applies to ethics."
I believe, and so does the bible, that homosexuality is wrong. Does that mean I hate gay people? No. Ethics is philosophy, and according to ethics yes, it is unethical to be homosexual as well.
__________________
Delay™ :: Anaheim Ducks :: Frölunda Indians :: Team Sweden
 
Reply With Quote
Heres my question to Catholics and Cristians (and whoever else hates gays)
Nothing
Currently Banned
  #127 (permalink) Default 07-12-2008
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,221


How can something be wrong even if it does not negatively affect society or the individual (or the couple, in this case)? What argument do you have for thinking that it's wrong other than "God said so"?

You actually have to use your brain here, as preaching phrases from the bible will only do you a disservice.

Last edited by Nothing; 07-12-2008 at 08:24 PM.
 
Reply With Quote
Heres my question to Catholics and Cristians (and whoever else hates gays)
BORAT IS FOLLY
Statused
  #128 (permalink) Default 07-12-2008
 
BORAT IS FOLLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,734

Send a message via AIM to BORAT IS FOLLY Send a message via Skype™ to BORAT IS FOLLY

Quote:
Originally Posted by sC DeLAy View Post
Wow, I'm honestly profoundly amazed that you were so polite to me . You're the first person who seems rationally intelligent and actually accepts the fellow debaters point of view on a debatable issue. Thank you, for that, I commend you and appreciate your response which you also seem very much educated on. Back on track now...


Got a good laugh out of that one, ignored the rest of your post.

You know....because you're delay.
__________________
I'm back from the caves blastin' back at yo ass
 
Reply With Quote
Heres my question to Catholics and Cristians (and whoever else hates gays)
Spooky
Level 14
  #129 (permalink) Default 07-13-2008
 
Spooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tx
Posts: 237
Bungie Stats

Quote:
Originally Posted by sC DeLAy View Post
Wow, I'm honestly profoundly amazed that you were so polite to me . You're the first person who seems rationally intelligent and actually accepts the fellow debaters point of view on a debatable issue. Thank you, for that, I commend you and appreciate your response which you also seem very much educated on. Back on track now...

This is what your original statement was. "I do not think that there is a being that makes an effort to have an opinion on my sexual partner."
My response to you by using bible verses was to say that yes, there is a superioir being, and also that, yes he does in fact have an opinion on your sexual partner.

Sex is more than physical (although many people, especially men, would not agree) it is also emotional and spiritual. The unifying of two bodies into one, and the giving of ones self to another. I would say that's pretty spiritual and emotional. Matthew 19:4-6 is Jesus talking to a group of Pharisees, He said...
"Haven't you read," he replied, "that at the beginning the Creator 'made them male and female,' and said, 'For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh'? So they are no longer two, but one."
It's just that the media and todays society has succesfully annihilated the purpose of sex. So many many people have a very twisted scewed view of what sex was even intended for.

The entire rest of your post under the part of which I highlighted I would break down into 4 sections....
1. "Not every living thing needs a female mate to reproduce (take account of the self breeding plants and animals)"
I would agree with this. God created them that way, so let them multiply accordingly.

2. "You are only addressing a problem that affects people who want to have children naturally (also ignoring the unnatural process of artificial insemination)."
I am addressing all people. I think it is wrong for the same sex to be with one another romantically/sexually. That's not how it's supposed to be. Male and female were created for one another, not female for female, and not male for male. Genesis 2:18-24 says this...
Then the LORD God said, "It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him." Now out of the ground the LORD God had formed every beast of the field and every bird of the heavens and brought them to the man to see what he would call them. And whatever the man called every living creature, that was its name. The man gave names to all livestock and to the birds of the heavens and to every beast of the field. But for Adam there was not found a helper fit for him. So the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and while he slept took one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh. And the rib that the LORD God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man. Then the man said, "This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man." Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.

3. "The fact that I might enjoy the company of a female companion occasionally in my own private life, I hope, would not be an issue with my ethics."
I would say that the passage above is pretty clear that what you wrote above is wrong. Doesn't matter if it's your own private life or not. Doesn't matter if it's occasionally or not. It's wrong.

4. "The concept of homosexuality is a socially created phobia. There is no such thing as "we are not supposed to", that only applies to ethics."
I believe, and so does the bible, that homosexuality is wrong. Does that mean I hate gay people? No. Ethics is philosophy, and according to ethics yes, it is unethical to be homosexual as well.
You no doubt hold your beliefs in high regard, which I respect. I would have to say however, we should agree to disagree. For a debate between us will go no further than our acceptance that one another truly believes in simply what we think is true. I can not say you are wrong, because to me there is no man/woman that has absolute truth. I have accepted that if there are consequences associated with my social indiscretions that I have made my place in "hell". Luckily, for you in that instance you would be fine. I also do not believe if someone chooses to have faith and religion as a guide to be an ethical person that they would be penalized by force behind our creation. I have always considered that to be a personal choice that once again "it" does not have an opinion on. I believe there is some reward in being a good person whether that reward is delivered socially, at the end of our existence, or for our own peace of mind, I do not know.
__________________




 
Reply With Quote
Heres my question to Catholics and Cristians (and whoever else hates gays)
sC DeLAy
Level 29
  #130 (permalink) Default 07-14-2008
 
sC DeLAy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Huntington Beach
Posts: 1,602

Send a message via AIM to sC DeLAy Send a message via Skype™ to sC DeLAy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spooky View Post
You no doubt hold your beliefs in high regard, which I respect. I would have to say however, we should agree to disagree. For a debate between us will go no further than our acceptance that one another truly believes in simply what we think is true. I can not say you are wrong, because to me there is no man/woman that has absolute truth. I have accepted that if there are consequences associated with my social indiscretions that I have made my place in "hell". Luckily, for you in that instance you would be fine. I also do not believe if someone chooses to have faith and religion as a guide to be an ethical person that they would be penalized by force behind our creation. I have always considered that to be a personal choice that once again "it" does not have an opinion on. I believe there is some reward in being a good person whether that reward is delivered socially, at the end of our existence, or for our own peace of mind, I do not know.
Very wise of you Spookster. I would concur with your agreeing to disagree. I appreciate your respect towards me and my beliefs, I truly do. As you actually took them into account and then replied to me in a manner worthy of being responded to. Which so many in this forum fail to do. I likewise respect you and your beliefs.
__________________
Delay™ :: Anaheim Ducks :: Frölunda Indians :: Team Sweden
 
Reply With Quote