I have no theories backing non-belief, the fact is, the little proof that there is, all backs believing - there is nothing supporting non-belief

??????

I'd say it's a fairly decent source.

Have you not researched anything? Your future in the debate section looks ugly, my friend.

__________________

There is a difference between a theory backing non-belief and having arguments against belief.

__________________

Damnit you beat me I went back a page to see what you said originally to try and make sense of that post.

__________________

How, you know nothing about religion - all you can say is that "I think for myself", thats not an arguement, but how can you argue with thousands of years of people writing things down that all correspond and come together to form the most popular book of all time? It cannot be denied, so the only thing an atheist can do is ignore it

"People writing things down" "the most popular book of all time"

Good god, I can't refute that. Everybody may as well give up their Atheistic ways

__________________

First: who are you responding to?

Second: All of this correspondence sure produced a lot of inaccuracies

Third: Most popular book? Appeal to popularity fallacy. The Harry Potter series is in second place, beating the Koran -- does that say anything about the validity of JK Rowling's writings?

Fourth: Ignore is all atheists can do to make you people less annoying. It's unfortunate your god couldn't wipe you off the face of existence for us.

__________________

I'm pretty sure Britney Spears beat The Good Book On Tape in sales.

__________________

Whoever started this thread was right about the atheist thing....its kinda sad

Is that your rebuttal?

Why, dare I ask, is this "atheist thing" sad?

__________________