![]() |
|
| Welcome, Unregistered! |
|
| |
| Quality Difference? Better or Worse? | ||||||||
|
| |||||
| ||||||
| | I dont use x264 but its just for better quality. BIG ADVICE = Download windows media encoder.
__________________ iDraKo (5:08:18 AM): holy f.ck dude remix change ur fkn sig Jschaffter 09 (5:08:27 AM): haha k Drake and Josh | |||||
| ||||||
| Sponsored Links |
| |
| Quality Difference? Better or Worse? | ||||||||
|
| |||||
| ||||||
| | I'm looking for it on that page you gave me, he talks about it, but there is no dl link that i can find. | |||||
| ||||||
| Quality Difference? Better or Worse? | ||||||||
|
| |||||
| ||||||
| | I'll explain this again... Compression isn't to make your video look better. It's to make your video look the same as the source for a much lower filesize. x264 happens to be 2nd to best compressor on the planet. Me and a few others here have gotten uncompressed quality from 2200kbps. However x264 compresses better then wmv, so for 1500kbps x264 will give better "quality", and will be able to retain the look of the original source better then wmv.
__________________ ![]() 2005 14,433 members joined 2006 21,951 members joined 2007 19,183 members joined 2008 8,718 members joined | |||||
| ||||||
| Quality Difference? Better or Worse? | ||||||||
|
| |||||
| ||||||
| | Quote:
| |||||
| ||||||
| Quality Difference? Better or Worse? | ||||||||
|
| |||||
| ||||||
| | Quote:
x264 will look closer to your uncompressed .avi source. But I tell everyone. Xvid, and x264 are output formats. Meaning don't compress clips with them and edit with them. Use these for compressing the final montage.
__________________ ![]() 2005 14,433 members joined 2006 21,951 members joined 2007 19,183 members joined 2008 8,718 members joined | |||||
| ||||||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
|