Quote:
Originally Posted by XxscorpioxX  I agree with some of your points... surprisingly enough, but some of it I don't agree with. I think that autoaim is said to have more effect than it really does. |
I used to have a video somewhere showing how bad the cookie cutters were in h2 compared to h1, oh well.
Here is a link just showing how unbalanced h2 is, nothing to do with it's cookieness (except towards the end I believe)
http://media.putfile.com/Halo-2-compared-to-Halo-1 Quote:
Originally Posted by Tr4WM4 Halo 3 should have:
-Fall damage
-Weapons that counter other weapons (not just a few power weapons and all the rest suck)
-Balanced map designs that dont allow a team to control the map -(easily)
-men and women spartan designs so the game is truly balanced.... |
I agree with the first two, but I don't see how having annorexic female spartans would be at all balanced. Might as well put in female elites while you're at it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by x{Killionaire}x i disagree with everything you said, ever heard of balance in games?????? stop dissing Halo 2, i liked the game and people actually still play it! Bungie tried to make Halo 2 look the best game ever and I believe they did.
so they made the weapons easier to use, thank god for that! who cares? I am glad at the fact that they left auto-aim, now i dont have to worry about getting the small sniper redicle exacally on the head after i eat popcorn ont he controller. Games are not just about being pro so stop saying its "noobfied", life isnt about being pro at all |
You're a god damn idiot, you're the target audience of halo2. Games are suposed to be a challenge, and to take a break once in awhile from your everyday life. Saying "life isng about being pro" is downright stuipd as it is meaningless to this thread. Please, if you're some kind of a "casual" game then GET THE HELL OUT OF A HALO FORUM!
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkI3layde The development for Halo1 on the Xbox was about 9 months. I would rather have a company spend 10 months on a game then 9 months. |
Even if that was true (which I'm more than positive it's not.) you're telling me bungie managed to f**k up more than any halo fan could imagine in that extra month. Brilliant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by s**tsu 90% of people defending this s**tty sequel have either never played h1 or played it once, was bad, so they went back to the game where EVERYONE is good. |
Basically.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Provolown Let this be said for all you idiots who complain about Halo 2 and Halo:CE
For every one con in Halo 2, There is one for Halo:CE.
And I can guarantee that. |
I can garentee that there are significantly more cons in h2 than there are in h1 in a
gamer's perspective. I would assume that anyone in a Halo forum is a gamer, but from the replies I've seen in my time spent here, apparently not.
-----
5 pages, 40+ replies, 400+ views.. Just to prove me right, love the predicted responses with NO valid vounter-points to my acusations. <3 fragile-X h2 fanboys. You're the cancer of this gen's video gaming, may you all suffer for being so pampered.
Join Date: Jan 2007
. i would play another game but i have no money to get one 
But I also noticed it was good for suprise. While I was jumping into the air in Beavercreak I shot towards one of the snipers (you know where they are hiding) and I only shot like 10 shots from each of my needlers and he died really quick.
So this weapon is bad sometimes and good sometimes but mostly bad. But it is fun to use sometimes I must say.
07-05-2007
Linear Mode
