Originally Posted by MarkedAchilles

I just awnsered you on that. There isn't one right now. Just because I am an atheist doesn't change my awnser. Most scientists are religious. I am in the minority. Granted we are growing in numbers but still a minority. Religion has nothing to do with this. Since there isn't any evidence for the formation of space, I cannot give you an awnser. I am not going to make one up just to appease myself and make me feel safe that there is an awnser, even if I just made up that awnser. So the awnser for you is I don't know.

Brass - I think this thread is above your pay grade.

Why are you an atheist then?, because it seems that science is not providing you with answers. You used to boast about how atheism and science are only base on facts NOT faith. Yet, you have put your FAITH in science to come up with a theory regarding the origin of space. If you do not have any proof or theory regarding the origin of space, then the only other possible solution would have to be belief in a Creator. Tell me what you disagree with in this post.

Originally Posted by Phat O 101

Why are you an atheist then?, because it seems that science is not providing you with answers. You used to boast about how atheism and science are only base on facts NOT faith. Yet, you have put your FAITH in science to come up with a theory regarding the origin of space. If you do not have any proof or theory regarding the origin of space, then the only other possible solution would have to be belief in a Creator. Tell me what you disagree with in this post.

Exactly, and that creator is God.

If any1 has to question that post that i just made well, i'm gonna brb in like 15 min so wait that long

Originally Posted by II Br@ss II

Wow, did you even read the points at least half of them cannot be explained. By the way you play tennis? Same here. How competitive are you at it?

Actually, I read all of them. I am in astronomy, and they say many things that fill in the gaps. We currently are not in the big bang theory yet, but they tell us many things about star formation. I took it because I don't like anatomy.

I play tennis for my high school. It sucks though, I was hitting really good before the winter, and when we got into the tennis season, somehow I lost it. So, I am trying to get back to where I was. I have i guess you can say a mediocre serve compared to Pros. I hit a 105 Mph serve with a (i think) 13 ounce racket. I get it in on a good day 1/2 tries. I dont have a RAINBOW second serve, I just slow down my first serve. I have been playing for 2 years now. I am ok for how long I have been playing.

BTW, just becuase I am backing up the big bang theory, doesnt mean that I believe thats what happened. I just do it because I love astronomy, and if its all a fairy tale, i can live with that. I love watching the stars on a nice clear summer night. Absolutley beautiful.

Originally Posted by DarthV8R

Actually, I read all of them. I am in astronomy, and they say many things that fill in the gaps. We currently are not in the big bang theory yet, but they tell us many things about star formation. I took it because I don't like anatomy.

I play tennis for my high school. It sucks though, I was hitting really good before the winter, and when we got into the tennis season, somehow I lost it. So, I am trying to get back to where I was. I have i guess you can say a mediocre serve compared to Pros. I hit a 105 Mph serve with a (i think) 13 ounce racket. I get it in on a good day 1/2 tries. I dont have a RAINBOW second serve, I just slow down my first serve. I have been playing for 2 years now. I am ok for how long I have been playing.

BTW, just becuase I am backing up the big bang theory, doesnt mean that I believe thats what happened. I just do it because I love astronomy, and if its all a fairy tale, i can live with that. I love watching the stars on a nice clear summer night. Absolutley beautiful.

How did tennis get brought up in here i thought this was evolution debate

The String Theory

It's the most widely accepted as of now.

http://www.superstringtheory.com/

Also Marked, what is the name of the oldest found human remnants and how old were they.

Originally Posted by Phat O 101

Why are you an atheist then?, because it seems that science is not providing you with answers. You used to boast about how atheism and science are only base on facts NOT faith. Yet, you have put your FAITH in science to come up with a theory regarding the origin of space. If you do not have any proof or theory regarding the origin of space, then the only other possible solution would have to be belief in a Creator. Tell me what you disagree with in this post.

If you want to continue with this conversation do it in a PM. This is not the topic of this thread.

I will awnser on this topic one last time though. I have found a rational explanation for every question I have ever posed. I have never questioned the beginning of the universe, it really doesn't apply to me. I have questioned as to how it works, that means something to me.

I rule my life by facts. There aren't any with god. So god or the easter bunny do not really affect me unless the bring me candy. I havn't recieved candy from either. Just my parents.

Brass - much better post. Congrats.

But if you are going to put those things down as YOUR ideas, well that is a bit missleading since you did not come up with them. You did not do any research or reading into the material. A simple google search of religious sites trying to refute scientific theory is really laughable though.

I like the It's not Squeezable one. Actually made me smile a bit.

What would happen if I went through every point in that post and showed its flaws. I believe there were 42. So if I do that what happens? I do not want nothing to happen if I am going to take the time to go through each post and take the time to write a reply wich would be my own and not someone elses.

Originally Posted by hXc hiPPo

The String Theory

It's the most widely accepted as of now.

http://www.superstringtheory.com/

Also Marked, what is the name of the oldest found human remnants and how old were they.

Human remnants - I would confine myself to our closest relatives. About 200,000 years old, female, from Africa. Every human on earth is genetically related to this person. Genetically that would be the oldest "human", if you mean our predecessors like Africanus, habilus, sapiens then just google them. But genetically that would be the awnser you would want.

- PS this means that we are all black

#### This is an Evolution thread, not a god thread or big bang thread, please at least TRY to confine posts to the topic at hand. Create another thread for the Big Bang #####