I didn't mean it like that.
I meant it as in, when you ride everytime and get hurt, you at least know your having fun each time. Because when you ride and have fun you usually will get hurt.

__________________

Uhhh....no?

You don't understand. Nvm

__________________

I understand perfectly, but every time I've gotten hurt on my bike its never been a good time, I always had more fun not getting hurt.

And you never answered, have you ever even rode a dirt bike? You shouldn't get a 450 if you haven't, you probably shouldn't even get a 250 if you haven't, regardless of your size. Cause you are gonna get a lot more than you expect, whether you think you know a lot about them or not.

Yeah I've rode
I am a very good responsible rider, and my dad wouldn't let me get anything below a 250 2 t and I don't want a 250 2 t because its to much maintainable and takes to much time, I just wanna get up and go, you know?

P.s: You don't get how I am saying it Its to hard to explain :P

__________________

i dont see why you are putting down Kawasaki Ninja's so much they are just fine. the new ones. Here read this article about my 2007 Ninja http://www.sportrider.com/bikes/2007..._6r/index.html they have improved it a ton and its really good handling with tons of power behind it. Oh and make sure to read the last paragraph on that article on the first page. it shows how awesome Kawasaki Ninja's really are. at least the Zx-6r series.

And why do you say, oh Ninjas suck because they suck at moto GP???? its all about the rider and how the race team tuned the bike. Most moto gp people has either a Suzuki or a Yamaha.. because there team knows how to tune the bike just right. The Kawasaki ninja dudes in moto gp just sucks. Moto Gp bikes to sportbikes that you can buy is completly different. And Kawasaki ninja is awesome. I wonder why i see more Ninja's then other sportbikes around here.. hmmmm. and i think its quite funny that other brands are copying off of Kawasaki for the 250cc. Because Kawasaki knows what to do. they are making a sh.t ton of money off those things. I just dont know why you put down Kawasaki so much because really they are great. My 2007 Kawasaki is the best handling bike out of all of them for that year, with really good performace/ redesigned engine.

So yea.. i just thought i would throw that out there.

__________________

My 2007 Kawasaki Ninja zx6r I love it.


Gt: xSpar7anx many people know me as DarkDefeater7 Member # 1100 Im legendary here.
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2164066 My Car/Motorcycle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWTuu1NMWwY My dream car, "Toyota Supra"

Without doubt, I said in 09 that Kawasaki is improving their Ninja. They have some of the fastest bikes on the market.
Now onto Motogp. If you were smart and watched it you would know that not everything is Suzuki and Yamaha. First of all, Yamaha knows how to race because they have Valentino Rossi, and Georg Lorenzo. IMO the two best racers. Also, second off, "all riders have Suzuki or Yamaha." Have you ever seen a motogp race? There are 4 Ducatis, 7 Hondas, 4 Yamahas, 2 Suzukis and 2 Kawasakis. Wanna tell me that there all Yamaha and Suzuki?
Ok, onto the next subject in your 5 subject paragraph.
Your right, Moto GP and normal sportsbikes are different. MotoGP = Prototype. But you missed the point. Almost all the bikes are equal, but why is Kawasaki at the bottom of the list? Huh?
You see more Ninjas than sportsbike in America, because people are stupid. They hop on a bandwagon of one brand and buy it. The Ninjas, in comaprison to a R6 are slow, undurable and don't handle as well. If you went to Europe for example, you would see more Yamahas than anything.

Next, copying? Honestly, are you this stupid? No offense, but go research before you post.
In the early 1990's Honda had the first CBR250RR. They discontinued it to work on their higher performance models, 600cc, 750, 1000
And yamaha is doing a 250 because, look. They have all the top high end ones they need, as well as a 125. Now they need to fill in the gap for new riders, thus the plans for a 250.
You know what I find funny? You think they're copying, yet they're doubling the performance of a 250 Ninja, Better top speeds, performance overall.
Next, they are making a sh.tload of money on them? Why? Because other companies are busy performing on their higher end bikes, and making their lower end bikes. Thus making Kawasaki the only one avail at the moment.

I put them down because Kawasaki doesn't prove it. They lose Motogp, they lose WSB they lose BSB, they lose every series, except maybe AMA because AMA isn't real racing.
And btw, the 07 R6 > your 07 piece of sh.t.
Yamaha top speed, 173.
Kawasaki top speed? Like 160.
Handling on a yama > your handling.

Thanks, GG

__________________

You idiot, you make it sound like thread creations are limited. Stop.

Anyway, I'd go with either a Honda or Yamaha... maybe a Suzuzki.

Hayabusa 1000.

__________________

Rofl hayabusa 1000.
I don't think I could handle a 15hp turbo'd Busa. That sh.t is so lush and fast.

I really want a Yama, but I also want a Honda.
and I cant find a nice Suzuki near by me, but I KNOW I may be able to get a honda and I know I cant get a yamaha from the dealer up in town.
I am win-win anyway Just down to a brand to brand fight lol

__________________

Hayabusa actually have 1300 soemthign cc.