I'm not one to bring up personal issues, but I've done perfectly well so far without a father.

I believe that love has no gender. However, I would not call it being a hypocrite because I myself am not gay/homosexual/bisexual. The "people" are always saying how it's their life and they should live if how they want, and that's totally true. You only have one life to live, and too have some silly law saying that you can't go through with your dreams because it's not ethical .. ? That's just stupid.

America - The land of the free.

Only one or two states actually allow same-sex marriage. The rest, under "American Law", say that you can't have same-sex marriage. I guess that just throws out the free part and leaves it, "America - Land" ..

So what if they can't reproduce? Now that's what I call being hypocritical.

ZOMG, the congress is under heavy pressure! Sooner or later, the world will be too populated to continue regular life!

ZOMG, let's not allow gay marriage! One reason is so that the world can get more populated!

Are you out of your mind .. ?

Defiler, you said that "A child deserves a mother and a father that are functional together."
!??!!?!?!??!?!?!!11

Even if it didn't have anything to do with gays or homosexuals, the child still has a chance to have a nonfunctional family. That's just crazy.

(It's not like allowing gay marriage will decrease population. The same amount of people will be producing. There will just be more married couples, is all. No change in population, lmao.)
Now, as a semi-closing, I'd rather see America with 100% happy couples than 75% happy couples and the other 25%, gays and homosexuals, causing more controversy by rioting the streets about how they're not treated fairly.

__________________