Originally Posted by Inconceivable

No, not quite. My argument is that it's a growing, living being, and therefore, abortion of this growing, living being would be considered murder.


1. I like the attitude I have here. It actually helps me better put my post. Ty, for the hint, though.

2. I realize that noone but the mother/father should have rightful control over whether the fetus is aborted, but that doesn't change the fact that to me, it's wrong. I mean, any debater could ask a question, only to be stalemated by the same, opposite question. That's basically what you're doing. However, while I realize this, I also realize that the way I see it, it's murder, it's wrong, and it's inhuman. I could tell an almost-mother that abortion is wrong, but that doesn't mean she'll listen. I understand your point, but I already have a steady point of my own. :]



1. No, I do believe that you've misunderstood me, mister General. My argument is that shutting off all cell activity would indeed shut off the entire units life force. When a fetus is aborted, ALL of it's cells are shut off and rendered incapable of any other reproduction/activity. Is this arguable to you?

2. Well, that's pretty much an opinion, unless you can prove otherwise. No, I actually didn't leave out any of my definition. If you actually looked, those are two, not completely, but different definitions. I never argued that the cells and tissues of a fetus were human, but they ARE alive, which would make abortion murder.



Yes, I actually was referring to people. Please, though, prove to me that the human body count has not reached trillion. If you can, I'll admit defeat .. For this argument. Tyvm, captain. :]