Quote:
Originally Posted by thewelcomewagon  This may be a change in the subject but I have some questions.
I do believe in micro-evolution and natural selection obviously because they have been proven. I may not know every detail about evolution but I want to try to understand.
I do not believe in macroevolution and the common ancestor part of evolution. To me there is no proof good enough for me to believe it (maybe like atheists or agnostics with Christianity or any other religion) there is no fossil proof that I've heard or seen of but if there is please correct me. And my biology teacher said that we don’t see evolution because it happened so slowly but how come we don’t have fossils of species when they are evolving into others like fish into snakes, she said that we don’t have those fossils because the process happens to fast and fossils are hard to come by.
So my questions are
Are there fossils when a species is evolving into another?
and
What do you think about my teacher’s explanation for no fossils? |
http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html#CB
Read every single entry before you post again on this subject.