Quote:
|
Originally Posted by xM1LkMaNx I dont like abortion, i just believe that killing an innocent child is bad and is wrong, if the parent cant afford to have the child then she/he can give it to foster care. I dont think killing a child that has just taken a breath should be killed, its sad i think.  |
Killing babies is wrong, but abortion IS NOT KILLING BABIES! It's the destruction of tissue. For f..k sake, a tad pole is about 1,000 times more developed than aborted tissue.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by boonior I'm against abortion. If you know the circumstances of sex and what it can lead to, then you are risking something that you are gambling with. If you get a girl pregnant or vice versa, then it is your fault to live with. Abortion is just another excuse to kill a living being, it's wrong, just like assistant suicide. People argue that it's (the baby) just in the process or stages of developing into a baby. What!? It's still a human being, whether it's "still in the process" or not. A life should be valued not taken away by one's wrong of inability to support it or fault. Also, have you seen what they do in the process of Abortion!? It's inhumane, vile and completely wrong. Those babies are people too, we kill there right to live. The first and most fundamental of all human rights is the right to life, and that when this right is denied all other rights are threatened. Society will be judged on the basis of how it treats its weakest members; and among the most vulnerable are surely the unborn and the dying.
PS: Ever consider Adopting after the baby is born? If you cannot afford to support it, then adopt it.
|
Explain why a glob of tissue has rights. If that glob of tissue has rights, than every single cell in your body should have the
same rights as that aborted tissue. We could take the DNA from the nucleus of any cell in your body and stick it into an egg cell and have a human being - by your convoluted definition anyway. If you want to be natural about it, than every single sperm in your body has the potential to be a baby. Where are there rights? Your being a bit hypocritical.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ganksta child No, if a woman is pregnant, she doesn't have to do anything but stay alive and the baby will be born. If I just sit here, kepping my self alive, a baby will not be born and I am not killing anything. |
Wrong. A woman has to do a
lot more than just stay alive. She has to take proper care of it; she has to properly feed it; and keep herself out of harm's way. That's not nearly as easy as you make it sound. If you were a woman, and pregnant, would you be prepared to stay static for 9 months and eat good enough to have a healthy baby? It might sound easy, but it's really not.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cursed Lemon Do you know how many kids actually get adopted? |
Less than 100,000, I believe. There are millions of kids still waiting to be adopted.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Colostomizer Every sperm cell in your underdeveloped, not-yet-descended nutsack is a potential human being. Potential meaning not yet a human being. Early enough in the pregnancy, unborn babies are also potential human beings. There is a point before which they aren't human, and after which they are. What do you think qualifies a mass of cells as a human being? |
Exactly. A human being should have a cortex, right? What 'separates' us from a dog is our large cortex (really, the frontal lobe of the cortex does most of our higher thinking). Without a cortex, it's, more or less, just a glob of human tissue.